Post sponsored by NewzEngine.com

Source: United Kingdom – Ministry of Defence

Documents

Algeria annual review summary
ODT, 30.9KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Combined Iraq annual review summary
ODT, 34.8KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Egypt annual review summary
ODT, 28.2KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Jordan Defence and Borders annual review summary
ODT, 25.4KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Jordan Economic Sustainability annual review summary
ODT, 36.8KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Jordan Internal Security annual review summary
ODT, 34.1KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Jordan Political Stability annual review summary
ODT, 31.3KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Lebanon Community Stability annual review summary
ODT, 33.7KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Lebanon Security annual review summary
ODT, 22.1KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Libya annual review summary
ODT, 30.7KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Middle East Peace Process (MEPP) annual review summary
ODT, 24.7KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Morocco annual review summary
ODT, 34.4KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

North Africa Technical Assistance Facility annual review summary
ODT, 32.8KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

North Africa Regional Co-operation Fund annual review summary
ODT, 18.2KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

North Western Syria Programme: completion summary
ODT, 34KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Southern Syria Programme: completion summary
ODT, 33.2KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Tunisia annual review summary
ODT, 33.8KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Whole of Syria Programme: completion summary
ODT, 22KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Yemen annual review summary
ODT, 32.6KB
This file is in an OpenDocument format

Details

All Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (CSSF) programmes are subject to rigorous annual reviews. These reviews assess:
technical and programme management standards including financial and risk management, value for money, conflict and gender sensitivity
contextual factors such as changes to the political environment
An expert team, usually of 3 people, conduct these reviews. At least one person is independent from the programme. Assessments are scored at output level (the direct result of programme activities) and outcome level (the changes that these outputs deliver). Scores are on a scale of A+, where outputs or outcomes exceed expectations, to C, where outputs or outcomes substantially did not meet expectations.
We aim to publish information for all CSSF programmes. However, due to the highly sensitive nature of some of the CSSF’s work, it is not possible to publish details of all programmes. The 2 main reasons why we may not be able to publish programme documents are to protect national security and the safety and security of beneficiaries, partners and partner governments.

Published 30 April 2020

MIL OSI United Kingdom